Test results
The 55-inch device delivers stunning images from all sources, rich sound, and luxurious features including the latest Ambient Mode. If it weren’t for the relatively high power consumption and small viewing angles (but this is entirely the fault of the panel technology), this model from Samsung would have topped our corresponding rating. But for the time being, she has to settle for “only” third place.
Advantages
excellent picture and sound quality
luxury equipment
very good smart-tv system
Flaws
relatively high energy consumption
Samsung GQ55Q9FN test results
- Price-quality ratio
Average - Place in the overall ranking
3 out of 37
- Value for money: 46
- Image quality (50%): 96.3
- Sound quality (5%): 92.9
- Equipment (25%): 97.1
- Ergonomics (15%): 100
- Energy efficiency (5%): 60.1
What makes the difference is the stability of the viewing angles.
A tighter race for the lead in our TV ranking could not be: LG OLED 55E8 holds the first place with a final score of 96.1 percentage points, while Samsung GQ55Q9FN with its excellent 95.7 points is placed in place at number 3 ( in our rating table as of mid-June 2018).
The main reason why the South Korean model won the victory was the panel manufacturing technology. While LG uses an OLED display, which, of course, hardly depends on the viewing angle, Samsung uses a classic VA panel. The maximum horizontal viewing angle, at which the TV retains at least half of its maximum contrast ratio, is only 20 degrees here, and the vertical one is 17 degrees.
The fact that things can be better with this is indicated by the Sony KD-55XE9305, which, despite using the same technologies, boasts 34 and 29 degrees, respectively.
The weak performance in this area is particularly unfortunate, as otherwise the image quality of this Samsung TV is exceptionally convincing, surpassing that of its OLED rivals the Sony KD-55A1 and Philips 55POS901F. In particular, the GQ55Q9FN offers an excellent checkerboard contrast ratio of 253:1, a high maximum contrast ratio of 5054:1, and a remarkable brightness of up to 1431 cd/m2.
Image quality turns out to be very good from all sources — whether it’s HDR10 or regular content. Whoever watches TV exclusively “frontally” and does not like public viewing, with this device will receive one of the best pictures at the moment in the field of top TVs.

Comprehensive equipment
In terms of equipment, the Samsung GQ55Q9FN also plays in the big leagues. In particular, this 55-inch TV offers an HD Twin Triple tuner, (2xDVB-T2/C/S2 each), a CI+ slot, four HDMI inputs, and a digital audio output. There is no analog headphone jack. But content can be transferred to external media data carriers via three USB ports. USB recording is also possible.
A special and innovative feature that is included in all Samsung GQ models is the so-called Ambient Mode. At the same time, the TV intelligently adapts to the appearance of the wall behind it, making it virtually invisible in standby mode, depending on the complexity of the background. In addition, it can display various useful information in this state, for example, about the weather.
As an operating system, as before, OS Tizen of Samsung’s own development is used. The Android competitor is visual, easy to use and very productive.
In the Smart TV hub you will find all the important video-on-demand services such as Netflix, Amazon Video and others, as well as numerous other applications and games. The Internet connection required for this can be configured selectively via LAN or WLAN.
somewhat gluttonous
While the sound quality of two speakers with a power of 20 W cannot be faulted either, the Samsung GQ55Q9FN makes a small mistake in the area of power consumption. In normal operation, this 55-inch TV draws an average of 135 watts, which in itself is still a bit much for a UHD device of this size. Of course, this indicator can be slightly reduced using the ECO mode, but still, the TV’s characteristics are only enough to receive the EU “B” energy efficiency label.
Samsung GQ55Q9FN test results












Alternative options:
Philips 55POS901F
Those who spend a lot of time in front of the TV with their family or regularly look at the screen from a high angle should consider purchasing a device with more stable viewing angles, that is, OLED technology, such as the Philips 55POS901F.
During testing, this UHD TV demonstrated not only convincing picture quality, but also luxurious equipment. Although the sound and power consumption were slightly worse than the Samsung, you can still survive at a cost of only about 128,000 rubles.
LG OLED 55E8
And LG OLED 55E8 thanks to OLED technology displays a wonderful picture regardless of the position of the viewer. In addition, it offers a comprehensive Smart OS, a large number of interfaces, and great sound.
The power consumption level, although a little high, is still normal for an OLED TV. The only point worthy of criticism is the lack of support for HDR10. At a cost, LG OLED 55E8 is at the level of about 180,000 rubles.
Samsung GQ55Q9FN specifications and test results
Price-quality ratio |
|
Screen and backlight type | |
local dimming | |
Screen diagonal | |
Permission | |
Image quality: HD TV | |
Image quality: Blu-ray | |
Maximum brightness | |
Maximum Contrast | |
Checkerboard contrast | |
HDMI 2.0 | |
3D: technology | |
3D: glasses included | |
Horizontal viewing angle (1/2 maximum contrast ratio) | |
Vertical viewing angle (1/2 maximum contrast ratio) | |
Power consumption during operation | |
Standby Power Consumption | |
Power saving mode | |
Energy class | |
Stand: swivel joint | |
Digital Cable TV Tuner | |
Digital satellite TV tuner | |
Connectors: HDMI | |
Connectors: Scart | |
Connectors: Composite (FBAS) | |
LAN | |
WLAN | |
Smart TV: Facebook | |
Smart TV: Amazon Instant Video | |
Smart TV: Netflix | |
Smart TV | |
Smart TV: Youtube | |
Smart TV: Installing additional software | |
Smart TV: Browser | |
HBBTV Services | |
USB | |
USB: TV recording | |
Network: DLNA support | |
DivX | |
H264 | |
HEVC | |
DTS | |
AC3 | |
MP3 | |
Headphone output | |
Digital audio output | |
Speakers | |
Dimensions (with stand) | |
Width (without stand) | |
The weight | |
Test date | |
screen inch price |
A photo: manufacturing companies